MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Change detection using multiscale segmentation and Kullback-Leibler divergence: Application on road damage extraction

2015· article· en· W1600782882 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsÉcole de Technologie Supérieure
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDivergence (linguistics)Computer scienceChange detectionKullback–Leibler divergenceArtificial intelligenceSegmentationPattern recognition (psychology)Extraction (chemistry)Image segmentationDempster–Shafer theorySimilarity (geometry)Feature extractionWaveletComputer visionData miningImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses the problem of change detection from very high resolution remotely sensed images and its application on road damage extraction in case of major disaster. The proposed methodology is based on the multiscale image segmentation using the Haar wavelet in order to define the appropriate unit of analysis for the comparison step. The Kullback-Leibler divergence is then applied as a similarity measurement to identify changed regions. This strategy is adapted to solve the road damage extraction problem by applying the Dempster-Shafer theory (DST). The images acquired during the earthquake that hits Port-au-Prince (Haiti) on 12 January 2010 are used in the experimentations and the obtained results demonstrate the accuracy and the efficiency of the described method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.826
Threshold uncertainty score0.580

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.080
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207