MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1601892874 · doi:10.1109/oceans.2005.1639817

A Kalman filter for the navigation of remotely operated vehicles

2005· article· en· W1601892874 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderwater Vehicles and Communication Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterRemotely operated underwater vehicleExtended Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)UnderwaterComputer scienceSensor fusionSimulationEngineeringMobile robotComputer visionArtificial intelligenceGeologyRobot

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A Kalman based asynchronous data fusion algorithm for the navigation of a tethered remotely operated underwater vehicle is presented. Using a non-linear dynamic simulation of the tethered ROV system, the performance of the Kalman filter is measured for various motion sensor combinations. The sensor suite tested includes a Doppler velocity log, fiber-optic gyrocompass, depth sensor and an ultra-short baseline position system. Provided the gyrocompass functions properly, the study shows that an extended Kalman filter which uses a complete model of the ROV, including, drag, tether and thruster effects, does outperform a constant velocity model in instances of sensor drop out. The positioning error is reduced by 20% in these instances. It is found that the ultra-short baseline system is the driving factor in the smoothness of the results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.456
Threshold uncertainty score0.126

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it