Query processing and optimization in native xml databases
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract XML has emerged as a semantic markup language for documents as well as the de facto language for data exchange over the World Wide Web. Declarative query languages, such as XPath and XQuery, are proposed for querying over large volumes of XML data. A number of techniques have been proposed to evaluate XML queries more efficiently. Many of these techniques assume a tree model of XML documents and are, therefore, also applicable to other data sources that can be explicitly or implicitly translated into a similar data model. The focus of this thesis is on efficient evaluation and optimization of path expressions in native XML databases. Specifically, the following issues are considered: storage system design, design of physical operators and efficient execution algorithms, and the cost-based query optimizer. The proposed storage system linearizes the tree structure into strings that can be decomposed into disk pages. Simple statistics are kept in the page headers to facilitate I/O-efficient navigation. Based on this storage system, a hybrid approach is developed to evaluate path expressions that exploit the advantages of navigational and join-based
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it