MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1604958078 · doi:10.1109/iscas.2002.1010442

Analog filter adaptation using a dithered linear search algorithm

2003· article· en· W1604958078 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Chan Carusone, D.A. Johns

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDitherGradient descentAdaptive filterControl theory (sociology)AlgorithmFilter (signal processing)Kernel adaptive filterComputer scienceDigital filterAnalogue filterMathematicsNoise shapingArtificial intelligenceComputer vision

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A variation of the differential steepest descent algorithm, here called the dithered linear search (DLS), is examined and applied to analog filter adaptation. The DLS algorithm is a gradient descent optimizer with a straightforward and robust hardware implementation. Gradient estimates are obtained by applying independent additive dither to all of the filter's parameters simultaneously and correlating the resulting changes in the output squared error to the dither signals. Unlike the popular LMS algorithm, the DLS algorithm does not require access to the filter's internal states. No additional analog hardware is required making it ideal for adaptive analog filters in mixed-signal systems. A theoretical analysis shows no gradient misalignment. The algorithm is verified on an integrated analog filter. The effects of dc offsets are also examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.055
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations14
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207