MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607074338 · doi:10.1002/env.2337

Bias correction in estimation of public health risk attributable to short‐term air pollution exposure

2015· article· en· W1607074338 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmetrics · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAir Quality and Health Impacts
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityHealth Canada
FundersHealth CanadaQueen's UniversityMcGill University
KeywordsTerm (time)ConfoundingEstimationEconometricsSmoothingAir pollutionStatisticsPollutionEnvironmental healthMathematicsMedicineEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Numerous epidemiologic studies have reported associations between short‐term air pollution exposure and mortality. Such short‐term risk models include smooth functions of time to control for unmeasured confounding variables. We demonstrate bias in these short‐term Generalized Additive Model estimates because of lack of accounting for long timescale variations and propose a family of improved time smoothers to reduce and control the bias. The strengths of the proposed smoother are twofold: a clear separating of short‐term and long‐term effects and an obvious choice of smoothing parameters from pre‐determined timescales of interest. We demonstrate improvements through simulations and analysis of examples of air pollution and mortality data from Chicago, Il. from the National Morbidity, Mortality and Air Pollution Study database, showing reduced bias in the risk estimates. © 2015 The Authors. Environmetrics Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.440
Threshold uncertainty score0.561

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.167
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it