MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607425258

Multi-parameter prediction for chaotic time series based on least squares support vector regression

2013· article· en· W1607425258 on OpenAlexaff
Jiezhong Ma, Yunchao Liu, Yangming Guo, Zhao Xiaomin

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Control Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicRemote Sensing and Land Use
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChaoticSeries (stratigraphy)Time seriesComputer scienceSupport vector machineReliability (semiconductor)Least-squares function approximationAlgorithmControl theory (sociology)MathematicsMachine learningArtificial intelligenceStatistics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fault prediction is important to the safety and reliability of complex equipments. According to the chaotic characteristic of complex equipments and the prediction theory of support vector machine, a multi-parameter adaptive prediction model is proposed. In order to improve the prediction availability and veracity, the model combines the development and change features of chaotic time series, and obtains the training samples through the phase space reconstruction of multi-parameter time series by referring to considering all informations from the chaotic time series of relative parameters. Prediction experiments are made via simulation of chaotic time series with three parameters of certain complex equipment. The results indicate preliminarily that the model is an effective prediction method for its good prediction precision.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Control ConferenceSame topicRemote Sensing and Land UseFrench-language works237,207