MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1607969721 · doi:10.1109/itsc.2003.1252706

Constrained unscented Kalman filter based fusion of GPS/INS/digital map for vehicle localization

2004· article· en· W1607969721 on OpenAlexaff
Wenjie Li, Henry Leung

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlobal Positioning SystemKalman filterInertial navigation systemComputer scienceGPS/INSSensor fusionDifferential GPSExtended Kalman filterUnscented transformInertial measurement unitNavigation systemDigital mappingFuse (electrical)Computer visionControl theory (sociology)Artificial intelligenceEngineeringAssisted GPSFast Kalman filterGeographyOrientation (vector space)Remote sensingMathematicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate vehicle localization is very important for various applications of intelligent transportation systems (ITS) including cooperative driving, collision avoidance, and vehicle navigation. In this paper, a constrained unscented Kalman filter (CUKF) algorithm is proposed to fuse differential global position system (DGPS), inertial navigation system (INS) and digital map to estimate the vehicle states. Using the road geometry information obtained from a digital map database, some state constraints can be formed. The measurements of DGPS and INS are used to set up the dynamic and measurement equations of the nonlinear filtering. The vehicle states are first estimated by the loosely coupled DGPS/INS system and the unconstrained UKF, and then the UUKF estimates are projected into the state constraints to obtain the final CUKF estimates. Synthetic and real data are used to evaluate the performance of the CUKF algorithm for fusing DGPS, INS and digital map.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations54
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTarget Tracking and Data Fusion in Sensor NetworksFrench-language works237,207