Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The genome rearrangement problem is to find the most eco-nomical explanation for observed differences between the gene orders of two genomes. Such an explanation is pro-vided in terms of events that change the order of genes in a genome. We present a new approach to the genome re-arrangement problem, according to which this problem is viewed as the problem of planning rearrangement events that transform one genome to the other. This method differs from the existing ones in that we can put restrictions on the num-ber of events, specify the cost of events with functions, pos-sibly based on the length of the gene fragment involved, and add constraints controlling search. With this approach, we have described genome rearrangements in the action descrip-tion language ADL, and studied the evolution of Metazoan mitochondrial genomes and the evolution of Campanulaceae chloroplast genomes using the planner TLPLAN. We have ob-served that the phylogenies reconstructed using this approach conform with the most widely accepted ones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it