MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1620404704

Mars Boundary-Layer and Dust Modelling for the Phoenix Lander Location

2006· article· en· W1620404704 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Patrick Taylor, Wensong Weng, B. T. Gheynani, P. Y. Li

Bibliographic record

VenueLPICo · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicPlanetary Science and Exploration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhoenixMars Exploration ProgramLidarBoundary layerPlanetary boundary layerMeteorologyEnvironmental scienceConvective Boundary LayerAtmosphere of MarsAtmospheric sciencesAerosolGeologyRemote sensingAstrobiologyAerospace engineeringGeographyMartianEngineeringPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction: The Phoenix lander, a NASA scout mission led by Peter Smith from University of Arizona, is scheduled to arrive on Mars in May 2008. Among other things it will make continuous meteorological measurements of pressure and temperature, plus some wind and humidity measurements. Phoenix will use a vertically pointing lidar provided by the Canadian Space Agency to observe profiles of dust and water ice particles. It is hoped to use the lidar data to determine boundary layer depths assuming a detectable drop in aerosol level at the top of the daytime convective boundary layer. In preparation for the mission we are conducting detailed modelling of boundary-layer and dust profiles at 70 degrees North on Mars.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.096
Threshold uncertainty score0.191

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLPICoSame topicPlanetary Science and ExplorationFrench-language works237,207