MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1620788170 · doi:10.1109/sice.2015.7285374

Model predictive control for an AUV with dynamic path planning

2015· article· en· W1620788170 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsModel predictive controlMotion planningControl theory (sociology)TrajectoryPath (computing)Computer scienceControl (management)Control engineeringScheme (mathematics)EngineeringMathematical optimizationRobotArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the model predictive control (MPC) for an autonomous underwater vehicle (AUV). We aim to develop a tracking control algorithm integrated with a dynamic path planning for the AUV. Considering that the effective range of onboard sensors cannot be large, we formulate the path planning problem into a receding horizon optimization framework with spline path templates. Once the local optimal path is constructed for the current time, it is viewed as a reference trajectory of the vehicle. In order to control the depth of AUV simultaneously and to have a friendly interaction with the dynamic path planning method, a nonlinear model predictive control (MPC) scheme is adopted. The simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed tracking control algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.959
Threshold uncertainty score0.497

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear SystemsFrench-language works237,207