MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W162236480

Colony Movement Dynamics and Management by Repellents of the European Red Ant Myrmica rubra (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)

2014· article· en· W162236480 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInsect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHymenopteraANTBiologyZoologyEcology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Myrmica rubra (L.) is an invasive, pestiferous ant in isolated sites in the northeastern United States and Canada. Its aggressive nature and painful sting can make it impossible for residents of heavily infested areas to use their lawns and gardens and endanger those who are sensitive to its venom. This species' ability to reach high densities and its generalist habits allow it to outcompete and virtually eliminate native ants at some sites. This could potentially lead to ecosystem level changes as ground dwelling ants turn over the soil and large changes in the ant community could lead to a change in the dissemination of nutrients as well an alteration in seed dispersal. The goal of this research was to expand our understanding of colony movement dynamics and to develop safe and effective methods to avoid further spread of this ant using repellents. Longterm monitoring of artificial nesting substrates, marking colonies, and laboratory and field trials provided new details about colony movement and M. rubra nesting preferences. Measurements from occupied and unoccupied nesting substrates revealed that colonies prefer cool, moist soil conditions. I found that colonies occupy the most nesting sites in the early spring. As the spring and summer season progresses most colonies emigrate from an occupied nest site or coalesce with other colonies so that the number of occupied nest sites in an area decreases. Marking worker ants with paint demonstrated that nests share individuals with other nests up to several meters away. This information is important for management of this species because it reveals which areas may be most vulnerable to immigration and that nests should not be treated singly, but considered as part of a network. Numerous assays were performed to evaluate the repellency of materials with low mammalian toxicity. The plant extracts spearmint, peppermint, D-limonene, and neem were tested in both the laboratory and the field against colonies searching for a nest site. All four extracts applied to pots of soil in the laboratory were effective at restricting colonization to some extent. In the field, all extracts were successful in repelling colonization of plant pots for several weeks indicating that these substances have the potential to protect potted plants from colonies in search of a nest. Cedar mulch as well as entomopathogenic nematodes and fungi were also tested for repellency in the laboratory as potential barriers to colonization, but these materials neither prevented colonization or caused colonies to emigrate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.548
Threshold uncertainty score0.572

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.182
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it