Colony Movement Dynamics and Management by Repellents of the European Red Ant Myrmica rubra (L.) (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Myrmica rubra (L.) is an invasive, pestiferous ant in isolated sites in the northeastern United States and Canada. Its aggressive nature and painful sting can make it impossible for residents of heavily infested areas to use their lawns and gardens and endanger those who are sensitive to its venom. This species' ability to reach high densities and its generalist habits allow it to outcompete and virtually eliminate native ants at some sites. This could potentially lead to ecosystem level changes as ground dwelling ants turn over the soil and large changes in the ant community could lead to a change in the dissemination of nutrients as well an alteration in seed dispersal. The goal of this research was to expand our understanding of colony movement dynamics and to develop safe and effective methods to avoid further spread of this ant using repellents. Longterm monitoring of artificial nesting substrates, marking colonies, and laboratory and field trials provided new details about colony movement and M. rubra nesting preferences. Measurements from occupied and unoccupied nesting substrates revealed that colonies prefer cool, moist soil conditions. I found that colonies occupy the most nesting sites in the early spring. As the spring and summer season progresses most colonies emigrate from an occupied nest site or coalesce with other colonies so that the number of occupied nest sites in an area decreases. Marking worker ants with paint demonstrated that nests share individuals with other nests up to several meters away. This information is important for management of this species because it reveals which areas may be most vulnerable to immigration and that nests should not be treated singly, but considered as part of a network. Numerous assays were performed to evaluate the repellency of materials with low mammalian toxicity. The plant extracts spearmint, peppermint, D-limonene, and neem were tested in both the laboratory and the field against colonies searching for a nest site. All four extracts applied to pots of soil in the laboratory were effective at restricting colonization to some extent. In the field, all extracts were successful in repelling colonization of plant pots for several weeks indicating that these substances have the potential to protect potted plants from colonies in search of a nest. Cedar mulch as well as entomopathogenic nematodes and fungi were also tested for repellency in the laboratory as potential barriers to colonization, but these materials neither prevented colonization or caused colonies to emigrate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".