MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1627059930 · doi:10.3934/dcds.2017242

Infinitely many positive solutions of fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equations with non-symmetric potentials

2017· article· en· W1627059930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueDiscrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicNonlinear Partial Differential Equations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultiplicity (mathematics)PhysicsNonlinear Schrödinger equationMathematical physicsNonlinear systemSchrödinger equationMathematical analysisMathematicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider the fractional nonlinear Schrödinger equation\begin{document}\begin{equation*}(-Δ)^su+V(x)u=u^p \mbox{ in }\mathbb{R}^N, u→0~\mathrm{as}~|x|→+∞,\end{equation*}\end{document}where $V(x)$ is a uniformly positive potential and $p>1.$ Assuming that\begin{document}\begin{equation*}V(x)=V_{∞}+\frac{a}{|x|^m}+O\Big(\frac{1}{|x|^{m+σ}}\Big)~\mathrm{as}~|x|→+∞,\end{equation*}\end{document}and $p,m,σ,s$ satisfy certain conditions, we prove the existence of infinitely many positive solutions for $N=2$. For $s=1$, this corresponds to the multiplicity result given by Del Pino, Wei, and Yao [24] for the classical nonlinear Schrödinger equation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.956
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it