A vision based online motion planning of robot manipulators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This article presents a vision based online system for the robust trajectory planning of robot manipulators. It uses a 3D vision system to determine the relative position of the objects to be engaged and the obstacle to avoid, and a novel obstacle avoidance procedure for manipulator motion planning. From intensity images acquired by a CCD camera mounted on the robot arm, the salient features are first accurately and robustly detected and then grouped. Through the correspondences between the feature groupings and the model features, the 3D poses of the objects and the obstacles are determined and confirmed by back-projection. Once these poses are determined, an online procedure, based on redundancy resolution, is used to achieve obstacle avoidance. The approach utilizes a null space vector to set properly the robot configuration, and a potential field method to guide the end-effector. By pseudoinverse perturbation it also prevents singular configurations and local minima. The feasibility and effectiveness of the system is demonstrated by an experiment with online engagement and transportation of objects posed inside an aluminium frame.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it