Increased oxidized-LDL levels and arylesterase activity/HDL ratio in ESRD patients treated with hemodialysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Investigations, in which oxidized-low density lipoprotein (ox-LDL), serum paraoxonase (PON1) and homocysteine (Hcy) are considered together as important agents involved in the development of oxidative and atherogenic events in non-diabetic hemodialysis (HD) population, are limited. This case-control study was designed to evaluate these parameters in the patients and control subjects and to determine the correlations among the factors. METHODS: Forty-nine age- and sex- matched subjects, including 28 non-diabetic HD patients (paired pre-and post-dialysis samples) and 21 control subjects, were enrolled. Ox-LDL and Hcy levels were measured with ELISA and EIA methods, respectively. Arylesterase activity of PON1 was measured by spectrophotometric assay. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, ox-LDL levels were significantly increased both before (p=0.001) and after HD (p=0.036). Arylesterase activity-to-HDL ratio in HD patients was significantly higher than control subjects (p=0.003). Homocysteine levels in the ESRD patients were higher than control subjects both in pre-dialysis and post-dialysis. There was a significant positive correlation (r= 0.25, p= 0.026) between ox-LDL and homocysteine in samples obtained before HD. Logistic regression analysis revealed ox-LDL levels (OR=3.02, p < 0.001) and arylesterase activity/HDL ratio (OR=2.43, p=0.01) to be associated with the increased risk of ESRD. CONCLUSIONS: Ox-LDL levels and arylesterase activity/HDL ratio indicated the strongest association with ESRD risk. These factors, especially ox-LDL as an indicator of oxidative stress, may be biomarkers in evaluating the status of non-diabetic ESRD patients. Because of the pathogenic relationship between ox-LDL and homocysteine as nontraditional risk factors of atherosclerosis, therapeutic strategies adopted to reduce them may be useful in decrease of high prevalence of cardiovascular mortality in dialysis patients. In addition, measurement of PON1 activity to HDL ratio is possibly a more valuable biomarker than arylesterase activity alone in non-diabetic ESRD.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".