MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1633818566 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.math/0404349

On the Higher-Order Derivatives of Spectral Functions: Two Special Cases

2004· preprint· en· W1633818566 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2004
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMatrix Theory and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOrder (exchange)MathematicsApplied mathematicsChemistryPure mathematicsBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work we use the tensorial language developed in [8] and [9] to differentiate functions of eigenvalues of symmetric matrices. We describe the formulae for the k-th derivative of such functions in two cases. The first case concerns the derivatives of the composition of an arbitrary differentiable function with the eigenvalues at a matrix with distinct eigenvalues. The second development describes the derivatives of the composition of a separable symmetric function with the eigenvalues at an arbitrary symmetric matrix. In the concluding section we re-derive the formula for the Hessian of a general spectral function at an arbitrary point. Our approach leads to a shorter, streamlined derivation than the original in [6]. The language we use, based on the generalized Hadamard product, allows us to view the differentiation of spectral functions as a routine calculus-type procedure.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it