Using the SGI Pro64 Open Source Compiler Infra-Structure for Teaching and Research
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Modem optimizing compilers are complex programs that require from tens to hundreds of people-years to be developed. Thus professors must use third-party compiler infra-structures to introduce students to compiler optimizations. Until recently only infra-structures developed at universities, research institutes, or by GNU were widely available for teaching. However, in May 2000, SGI made public the source code for Pro64, a highly optimized suite of compilers for the Intel Architecture 64 (IA-64) that is an evolution of the established MIPSPro suite of compilers. The use of a production-level compiler infra-structure for teaching is thus new. In this paper we report our experience using the Pro64 in a graduate compiler optimization class. We paired the study of the Pro64 with the use of IMPACT within Trimaran, and with performance studies conducted with the MIPSPro compilers. The students feedback indicate that they valued working with a state-of-the-art compiler infrastructure and studying open research topics for their class projects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it