MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1639868770 · doi:10.4171/dm/220

Second order freeness and fluctuations of random matrices. III: Higher order freeness and free cumulants

2007· article· en· W1639868770 on OpenAlexafffund
Benoı̂t Collins, Piotr Śniady, Roland Speicher, James A. Mingo

Bibliographic record

VenueDocumenta Mathematica · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRandom Matrices and Applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersJapan Society for the Promotion of ScienceEuropean CommissionNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterstwo Edukacji i NaukiKillam TrustsCanada Council for the Arts
KeywordsCumulantMathematicsFree probabilityRandom matrixOrder (exchange)Invariant (physics)Matrix (chemical analysis)Pure mathematicsMathematical physicsStatisticsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We extend the relation between random matrices and free probability theory from the level of expectations to the level of all correlation functions (which are classical cumulants of traces of products of the matrices). We introduce the notion of “higher order freeness” and develop a theory of corresponding free cumulants. We show that two independent random matrix ensembles are free of arbitrary order if one of them is unitarily invariant. We prove \mathrm{R} -transform formulas for second order freeness. Much of the presented theory relies on a detailed study of the properties of “partitioned permutations”.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.004
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations68
Published2007
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDocumenta MathematicaSame topicRandom Matrices and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207