MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1640105340 · doi:10.3233/fi-2011-394

Analysis of Recognition of a Musical Instrument in Sound Mixes Using Support Vector Machines

2011· article· en· W1640105340 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueFundamenta Informaticae · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicMusic and Audio Processing
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversidade Federal do ABCMcGill UniversityUniversity of North Carolina at PembrokeLouisiana State University
KeywordsMusicalSpeech recognitionSound (geography)Support vector machineMusical instrumentComputer scienceAcousticsArtificial intelligencePhysicsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Experiments with recognition of the dominating musical instrument in sound mixes are interesting from the point of view of music information retrieval, but this task can be very difficult if the mixed sounds are of the same pitch. In this paper, we analyse experiments on recognition of the dominating instrument in mixes of same-pitch sounds of definite pitch. Sound from one octave (no. 4 in MIDI notation) have been chosen, and instruments of various types, including percussive instruments were investigated. Support vector machines were used in our experiments, and statistical analysis of the results was also carefully performed. After discussing the outcomes of these experiments and analyses, we conclude our paper with suggestions regarding directions of possible future research on this subject.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.373

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it