MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1643601001

Cascadia Great Earthquake Recurrence: Rupture lengths, Correlations and Constrained OxCal Analysis of Event Ages

2005· article· en· W1643601001 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
C. Goldfinger, A. E. Morey, M. Erhardt, C. H. Nelson, Joel E. Johnson, Julia Gutiérrez-Pastor

Bibliographic record

VenueAGUFM · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
Topicearthquake and tectonic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologySeismologyEvent (particle physics)Radiocarbon datingSeries (stratigraphy)Sedimentary depositional environmentBayesian probabilityMargin (machine learning)SubductionPaleontologyStatisticsTectonics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We are continuing to test correlation methods for a series of offshore cores along the Cascadia subduction margin. The goal is to correlate paleoseismic event along strike to determine rupture lengths for 23 Holocene events. To refine the 14C time series, we are applying multiple proxies, including XRF analysis, to the determination of hemipelagic thickness between turbidite events. With improved sedimentation rates, and time intervals represented by inter-event sedimentation, we use Bayesian statistical methods to combine and constrain radiocarbon ages. Using OxCal we incorporate limiting ages with known criteria including ash ages, hemipelagic sedimentation rates, and historical data to refine the error ranges for a given event. Multiple ages for the same event are also given “credit” for this, and rather than averaging, iterative Bayesian models are used to reduce the error range for events that are known to correlate, and or have independent constraints. This method significantly reduces C variability between along strike events that are thought to correlate. We also refine inter-site physical property correlation methods in parallel with C ages. Depositional patterns within events, recorded as magnetic susceptibility, chemical, and density patterns, match at widely separated sites in surprising detail. 16 individual event density-magnetic signatures between JDF and Cascadia Channel have correlation coefficients of 0.6-0.9, with two poor scores (0.16 and 0.32) for events with similar, but out of phase characteristics. The stratigraphic character of each event is clearly evident in the cores. In some cases, correlation of events hundreds of km apart is almost as robust as the correlation between piston and trigger core pairs only one meter apart. Numerical tests of the correlation patterns strongly support this conclusion. Values for other measures include: the number of sandy pulses per event down core(r=0.84-0.92), relative thickness pattern downcore (r=0.70-0.89), and whether these values could have come from a random sample of a normal distribution (rejected with 99% confidence). Thus, both individual event signatures, and the downcore stratigraphy are both highly unique and strongly comparable from site. The techniques being used are standard well log correlation methods, applies to paleoseismology. We are just beginning to explore similar correlation with shallow marine records along the Vancouver Island outer coast with some success. Strengthened correlations, refined C ages, and closer correlation with land events support long rupture lengths for at least 16 great earthquakes in the Holocene, extending from at least 42N to 48N. Several partial ruptures are evident, four limited to southern Oregon, one from central Oregon northward, and one from central Oregon southward. The penultimate event at ~ 1500 AD, is recorded at all offshore sites as a thin turbidite, partially eroded by the AD 1700 event, and is apparently only recorded at one, or a few land sites, suggesting perhaps a small event. The size patterns of the correlated events are remarkably consistent, with large events being large at all sites, and small event generally small at all sites, with rare exceptions. The size patterns are abrupt, changing thickness from event to event, and do not have long term or intermediate term trends, suggesting that climate or sediment rate changes are not the cause. This suggests a link between earthquake magnitude and turbidite size, though there is no known way to quantify this relationship if present. These paleoseismic results suggest that though Cascadia shows evidence of segmentation, the preferred rupture mode for events of at least M~ 8.0 or larger is for full or nearly full margin rupture.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAGUFMSame topicearthquake and tectonic studiesFrench-language works237,207