Optical model for prismatic glazing (1415-RP)
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Prismatic glazing is found in many building applications, such as complex fenestration systems to control solar heat gains and glare and re-direct sunlight to building interior spaces and daylighting (and lighting) systems to enhance their optical and lighting performance. However, modeling and simulation of such prismatic glazing has been a very difficult task due to its versatile and complex geometrics. This article presents the development and validation of a simplified model to compute the optical characteristics and dominant directions of the transmitted and reflected beam rays of sawtooth-like prismatic glazing. The model was based on tracing the average ray and was extensively validated using third-party data derived from ray tracing computer simulations and measurement using integrating spheres and goniophotometers. The model's predictions for the transmittance and reflectance of single and double prismatic panes compared well overall within the accuracy of the third-party data over all incidence angles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it