Second-Generation Recombinant Hemoglobin Molecules Do Not Stimulate Sphincter of Oddi, Gallbladder, or Duodenal Motility in the Australian Brush-Tailed Possum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Several studies have investigated the effects of hemoglobin-based oxygen carriers on gastrointestinal motility. Diaspirin cross-linked hemoglobin reduces sphincter of Oddi trans-sphincteric flow and increases duodenal motility in the Australian brush-tailed possum, effects attributed to nitric oxide (NO) scavenging. Recently, second-generation recombinant hemoglobin molecules with reduced NO scavenging ability have been developed. AIM: To determine the effects of two second-generation recombinant hemoglobin solutions and the prototype recombinant hemoglobin with high NO binding, on duodenal and biliary motility in the Australian brush-tailed possum. METHOD: Blood pressure; duodenal, sphincter of Oddi and gallbladder motility; and trans-sphincteric flow were recorded. The effects of recombinant hemoglobin or human serum albumin (control) solutions on these parameters were investigated. Each solution was infused intravenously at 1 mL/kg/min to deliver 250 mg/kg or 500 mg/kg. RESULTS: Duodenal contraction frequency was stimulated by the high dose of prototype recombinant hemoglobin, but not by a comparable dose of second-generation recombinant hemoglobin. The induced duodenal activity occurred in the later phase of the experimental period. In contrast, biliary motility and trans-sphincteric flow were not altered by any hemoglobin solution. The high dose of all the hemoglobin solutions elevated blood pressure, whereas the low dose solutions did not alter any parameter measured. CONCLUSION: At the doses studied, the second-generation recombinant hemoglobin with reduced NO binding capacity did not significantly alter duodenal and biliary motility, supporting the need for further studies to evaluate their potential usefulness as blood substitutes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".