Le texte dramatique dans un cours de théâtre francophone contemporain : pourquoi et comment l’enseigner?
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Résumé: Dans le contexte actuel où se multiplient les formes théâtrales qui se passent du texte, nous avons essayé de montrer pourquoi la lecture du texte dramatique convient toujours à une salle de classe contemporaine. Afin d’étayer notre proposition, nous avons retenu comme outil de réflexion et de travail une combinatoire de deux discours – humaniste et herméneutique – qui sert de cadre à l’étude de la dramaturgie francophone. Mots clés: Enseignement; dramaturgie; francophone; universitaire; humaniste; herméneutique; théâtre Summary: The current state of theatre is characterised, among other things, by a proliferation of forms that have become increasingly independent of dramatic text; however, there is still a strong case to be made for the reading and teaching of francophone drama in the classroom. Relying on a combination of humanist and hermeuntic theory, this paper seeks to show just how pertinent drama still is. Key words: Teaching, drama; francophone; university; humanist; hermeneutics; theatre
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.013 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".