MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1666400109

Jesuitas y fósiles en la Cuenca del Plata

2008· article· es· W1666400109 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueConicet · 2008
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Literary Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArchaeologyGeologyGeographyArt
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La madera y huesos petrificados referidos por los jesuitas Ovalle, del Techo, Sepp, Lozano, Guevara, Sánchez Labrador, Dobrizhoffer, Falkner y Juárez en varios textos escritos durante los siglos XVII y XVIII constituyen uno de los primeros registros de plantas y animales fósiles en la Cuenca del Plata. La mayoría de los jesuitas consideraba a los ríos Paraná y Uruguay capaces de transformar la madera y también los huesos, en piedra, y por ende, a las petrificaciones comúnmente desenterradas de sus barrancas arenosas como formadas por el agua. Por otro lado, mientras Guevara relacionaba los grandes huesos comúnmente hallados en la desembocadura del río Carcarañá con una raza extinguida de gigantes, Falkner describía la coraza de un gliptodonte y Sánchez Labrador explicaba la presencia de invertebrados marinos en los alrededores de Buenos Aires invocando al Diluvio.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it