MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1670662343 · doi:10.1029/2008pa001654

Early Maastrichtian carbon cycle perturbation and cooling event: Implications from the South Atlantic Ocean

2009· article· en· W1670662343 on OpenAlexaff
Oliver Friedrich, Jens O. Herrle, Paul A. Wilson, Matthew J. Cooper, Jochen Erbacher, Christoph Hemleben

Bibliographic record

VenuePaleoceanography · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeology and Paleoclimatology Research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionNational Science Foundation
KeywordsExcursionBenthic zoneGeologyOceanographyPaleontologyIsotopes of carbonDrillingCarbon cycleDeep seaIsotopeEcosystemEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Published stable isotope records in marine carbonate are characterized by a positive δ18O excursion associated with a negative δ13C shift during the early Maastrichtian. However, the cause and even the precise timing of these excursions remain uncertain. We have generated high‐resolution foraminiferal stable isotope and gray‐scale records for the latest Campanian to early Maastrichtian (∼73–68 Ma) at two Ocean Drilling Program sites, 525 (Walvis Ridge) and 690 (Weddell Sea). We demonstrate that the negative δ13C excursion is decoupled from the δ18O increase with a lag of about 600 ka. Our δ13C records (both planktic and benthic) show an amplitude for the negative excursion of 0.7‰ that falls between about 72.1 and 70.7 Ma. Our planktic δ18O records indicate an overall increase of 1.2‰ from 73 to 68 Ma at Site 690, whereas at Site 525 they record a slightly smaller increase (∼1‰) that peaks around 70.1 Ma with decreasing values thereafter. Our benthic δ18O data indicate an increase of ∼1.5‰ at Site 525 and ∼0.7‰ at Site 690 between about 71.4 and 69.9 Ma. Benthic δ18O values show different baseline values at the two sites before and after the excursion, but the larger increase at Site 525 means that the values attained at the peak of the excursion are similar at the two sites. We interpret this observation in terms of water mass changes. The excursion is interpreted to reflect a cooling of bottom waters in response to the strengthening contribution of intermediate‐ to deep‐water production in the high southern latitudes rather than increased ice volume. The associated carbon cycle perturbations that we observe are interpreted to reflect a weakening of surface water stratification and increased productivity, as supported by our gray value data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.185
Threshold uncertainty score0.367

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations92
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePaleoceanographySame topicGeology and Paleoclimatology ResearchFrench-language works237,207