MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W167550702

Spatial and Habitat Responses of Canada Lynx in Maine to a Decline in Snowshoe Hare Density

2014· article· en· W167550702 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueDigitalCommons (California Polytechnic State University) · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnowshoe hareGeographyHabitatDistance samplingEcologyBiology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Previous studies of Canada lynx (Lynx canadensis) within the northern boreal forest region have documented that lynx respond spatially to a decline in snowshoe hare (Lepus americanus) density, as exhibited by expansion of territories and changes in social structure. I compared home range area and spatial overlap in the southeastern portion of their geographic range during periods of relatively high and relatively low hare density. Home range areas of lynx did not change between periods of high and low hare density, except that home ranges of females during the denning season expanded during the low period. The presence of kittens constrained home range areas of reproductive females during denning because females were attending kittens. Intra- and intersexual overlap did not change as hare density declined, with the exception of a decrease in overlap between females. This decrease was likely caused by decreased reproduction during the low period, which reduced potential for territorial overlap among mothers and daughters. Hare density during the nadir of cycles in more northerly populations can reach levels nearly a magnitude lower than reported for Maine during my study. This may have prevented breakdowns in territories and changes in social structure by lynx, which may have shifted life history strategies towards territorial maintenance and reduced reproduction as hare densities declined. I also investigated changes in use of high-quality hare habitat (HQHH) at the landscape scale, and habitat selection of HQHH within home ranges of lynx between periods of high and low hare density. Lynx did not change their extent of use of HQHH at the landscape scale, suggesting lynx had adequate amounts of HQHH within their home ranges to encounter hares during both the high and low periods of hare density. Lynx exhibited stand-scale selection for HQHH during both hare density periods, but the intensity of female selection for HQHH declined as hare density declined. This suggests that lynx continued to remain focused on foraging for hares during both periods, but that females may become more generalized in habitat and prey selection during the period of lower hare density. Lynx monitored during this study wore GPS collars during a period of low hare density and VHF collars during a period of high hare density. This presented methodological challenges when I compared lynx responses between hare density periods. Errors associated with VHF collars were known for this study, but errors associated with GPS collars were not. Failed fix attempts and location inaccuracy caused by environmental and satellite configurations can bias habitat selection and spatial analyses. I evaluated fix success and location error of GPS collars in 7 habitat classes during 2 seasons in northern Maine. I also used an information-theoretic modeling approach to investigate covariates influencing fix success and location error. Canopy cover had the greatest influence on fix success and the configuration of available satellites had the greatest influence on location error. Results were used to compensate for habitat bias and location error caused by GPS collars worn by lynx during a period of low hare density.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.805
Threshold uncertainty score0.868

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it