Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article aborde la délicate question du rapport entre écrit sms et orthographe. En se basant sur un corpus de 60000 sms couvrant une partie non négligeable de la francophonie (France, Belgique, Suisse et Québec), nous présentons les grandes tendances de variation graphique des sms, des tendances régulières qui permettent une classification claire. Nous expliquons ensuite comment l’altération de la graphie dans les sms peut résulter de la transcription phonétique d’un français régional. Dans une troisième partie, nous abordons la question des rectifications orthographiques en examinant de plus près les points communs entre les règles régissant l’écrit sms et les principales rectifications orthographiques adoptées en 1990. Enfin, l’article présente les données sociolinguistiques des usagers du sms, qui offrent un riche témoignage des représentations linguistiques des auteurs de sms.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it