MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1694723240 · doi:10.1002/wcm.2596

An indoor radio propagation model considering angles for WLAN infrastructures

2015· article· en· W1694723240 on OpenAlexaff
Shuai Han, Zijun Gong, Weixiao Meng, Cheng Li

Bibliographic record

VenueWireless Communications and Mobile Computing · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIndoor and Outdoor Localization Technologies
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRSSComputer scienceRadio propagationRadio propagation modelGridMeasure (data warehouse)Fingerprint (computing)WirelessAttenuationWireless networkWi-FiSignal strengthReal-time computingTelecommunicationsData miningArtificial intelligenceWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Wireless local area network fingerprint‐based indoor location system is a hot topic these years because it needs no extra hardware and is very easy to deploy. However, it demands a database containing the distribution of received signal strength (RSS) of the area of interest,called radio map. Conventionally, we need to grid the area densely and manually measure RSS values on intersections, which will consume a lot of time and human resources. What is worse, change of the environment may render this database totally useless. Our consideration is to measure RSS on a small amount of these intersections and use them to build a radio propagation model. Then, this model can be deployed to predict RSS values of other intersections and reconstruct the radio map. In other words, we only need to collect a very small part the radio map and utilize the radio propagation model to recover the whole one. So far, many models have been proposed, among which the one suggested by Seidel, named floor attenuation factor propagation model, achieves great balance between computational request and accuracy. But it is not compatible with environments in some scenarios. So as to compensate for this deficiency, we take into account the angles formed by signal and surfaces of obstacles, and the results show better compatibility. The proposed model has four parameters that are related to the environments, and our second contribution in this paper is to propose a method to determine them. In fact, after collecting a small part of the radio map, we can estimate these parameters with least square method. Then, these parameters can be used to predict the signal strength at any other points in the same environment, and the whole radio map is rebuilt. According to practical experiments, performance of the radio map built by the proposed model is not as good as the manually collected one, but 80% of collecting labor is saved. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.037

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWireless Communications and Mobile ComputingSame topicIndoor and Outdoor Localization TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207