MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1714480694 · doi:10.3233/hsn-2006-282

Destination-driven shortest path tree algorithms

2006· article· en· W1714480694 on OpenAlexaff
Baoxian Zhang, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Speed Networks · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePath (computing)Tree (set theory)AlgorithmShortest path problemTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkMathematicsCombinatoricsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shortest Path Tree (SPT) is the most widely used type of tree for multicast provisioning due to its simplicity and low per-destination cost. An SPT minimizes the accumulated cost, individually, from the source of a group to each destination of the group. However, SPTs have not considered the overall resource utilization in their constructions. This work aims at building cost-effective SPTs by enhancing link sharing between destinations of a group. We achieve this goal by introducing destination-driven characteristic into SPT constructions. Specifically, each destination is connected with the source via a shortest path. When equal cost multiple paths are available, priority is given to the one biasing through a destination among all such routes. We accordingly present the design of an algorithm building destination-driven SPTs. To achieve further improved performance in resource utilization, we also present an algorithm, which is designed to further enhance link sharing among the destinations of a group while meeting a maximum path length constraint for each destination. Simulation results are used to demonstrate the high performance of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of High Speed NetworksSame topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207