MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1714480694 · doi:10.3233/hsn-2006-282

Destination-driven shortest path tree algorithms

2006· article· en· W1714480694 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of High Speed Networks · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePath (computing)Tree (set theory)AlgorithmShortest path problemTheoretical computer scienceComputer networkMathematicsCombinatoricsGraph

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shortest Path Tree (SPT) is the most widely used type of tree for multicast provisioning due to its simplicity and low per-destination cost. An SPT minimizes the accumulated cost, individually, from the source of a group to each destination of the group. However, SPTs have not considered the overall resource utilization in their constructions. This work aims at building cost-effective SPTs by enhancing link sharing between destinations of a group. We achieve this goal by introducing destination-driven characteristic into SPT constructions. Specifically, each destination is connected with the source via a shortest path. When equal cost multiple paths are available, priority is given to the one biasing through a destination among all such routes. We accordingly present the design of an algorithm building destination-driven SPTs. To achieve further improved performance in resource utilization, we also present an algorithm, which is designed to further enhance link sharing among the destinations of a group while meeting a maximum path length constraint for each destination. Simulation results are used to demonstrate the high performance of the proposed algorithms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score0.559

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it