Bibliographic record
Abstract
The series Conrad: Eastern and Western Perspectives is published by East European Monographs/Social Science Monographs, Boulder (USA) and Maria Curie-Sklodowska University, Lublin (Poland) and distributed by Columbia University Press, New York. Professor Wieslaw Krajka from Maria CurieSklodowska University is its editor.The series publishes (in English) studies and essays on various aspects of Joseph Conrad's literary output and matters related thereto. They focus primarily on (1) and East-Central European elements and contexts of Joseph Conrad's oeuvre; (2) worldwide, international perspectives upon them. It has become the principal publisher of select papers from most prestigious international conferences.Conrad: Eastern and Western Perspectives brings considerations of new issues in studies and reexaminations of old ones in illuminating and original presentations. They represent a broad scope of diverse critical approaches, intellectual traditions and cultural backgrounds. Some essays are rooted in Western literary theory and scholarship, whereas others introduce fresh theoretical-interpretative visions or approach Conrad's oeuvre from remote intellectual positions, broadening possibilities of interpretation. The series hopes to mark crossings of the shadow-lines beyond which criticism grows to maturity and opens ways to further insights.The twenty volumes of the series comprise contributions by 192 established and emerging scholars from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Chile, China, Croatia, Czech Republic, Denmark, France, Germany, Great Britain, India, Israel, Italy, Japan, Norway, Poland, South Africa, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Turkey, United Arab Emirates and the United States of America.Volume I: Carabine, Keith, Owen Knowles, and Wieslaw Krajka, eds. Conrad's Literary Career. Boulder: East European Monographs; Lublin: Maria Curie-Sklodowska University; distributed by Columbia UP, New York, 1992, pp. iv, 278.The volume contains sixteen articles on various aspects of Joseph Conrad's literary technique (impressionism, discursive deception, epistemological and ontological scepticism, metafictionality, the creative process, various narrative techniques and their functions, as well as on colloquialisms, musical motifs, ethical values, racism and imperialism, film adaptation and other issues). They examine both single major works by (from Almayer's Folly to Last Essays) and his entire literary output. The book's thematic diversity is matched by its critical diversity.The editors are professors of English literature at the University of Kent at Canterbury (Keith Carabine), the University of Hull (Owen Knowles) and Maria CurieSklodowska University Lublin (Wieslaw Krajka).Volume II: Carabine, Keith, Owen Knowles, and Wieslaw Krajka, eds. for Boulder: East European Monographs; Lublin: Maria CurieSklodowska University; distributed by Columbia UP, New York, 1993, pp. iv, 285.The book comprises fifteen articles divided into three sections: (1) Conrad and Things Polish (his life, reception, relation to literature and culture, his conception of East and West); (2) Gender (men-women intra- and inter-racial relationships within structures of imperialism, Marlow's misogyny); (3) Cultural Contexts (the use of popular exotic literary tradition, expatriai allusions, mystifications of the frontier, economic power and imperialism, the conservative-anarchist language of political discourse, moral disintegration and crisis of culture in and Mann).The editors are professors of English literature at the University of Kent at Canterbury (Keith Carabine), the University of Hull (Owen Knowles) and Maria CurieSklodowska University Lublin (Wieslaw Krajka).Volume III: Morzinski, Mary. Linguistic Influence of on Joseph Conrad's Style. Boulder: East European Monographs; Lublin: Maria Curie-Sklodowska University; distributed by Columbia UP, New York, 1994, pp. …
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.016 | 0.010 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".