Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The current available data on protein sequences largely exceeds the experimental capabilities to annotate their function. So annotation in silico, i.e. using computational methods becomes increasingly important. This annotation is inevitably a prediction, but it can be an important starting point for further experimental studies. Here we present a method for prediction of protein functional sites, SDPsite, based on the identification of protein specificity determinants. Taking as an input a protein sequence alignment and a phylogenetic tree, the algorithm predicts conserved positions and specificity determinants, maps them onto the protein's 3D structure, and searches for clusters of the predicted positions. Comparison of the obtained predictions with experimental data and data on performance of several other methods for prediction of functional sites reveals that SDPsite agrees well with the experiment and outperforms most of the previously available methods. SDPsite is publicly available under http://bioinf.fbb.msu.ru/SDPsite.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it