Navigation of Mobile Robot Using the PSO Particle Swarm Optimization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Robots are being used increasingly in different fields like industry and space applications. Nowadays there are even demands for application of robots in homes and hospitals. These robots should be able to move and navigate at indoor areas which consist of fixed and movable obstacles like walls and chairs, respectively. There is not a fixed map of obstacles in these applications and the robot should detect obstacles and decide how to move to achieve the goal while avoiding obstacles. In this paper, an intelligent approach for navigation of a mobile robot in unknown environments is proposed. Particle Swarm Optimization(PSO) method be used for finding proper solutions of optimization problems. At first the robot navigation problem is converted to optimization problem. Then PSO method searches the solution space to find the proper minimum value. Based on position of goal. an evaluation function for every particle in PSO is calculated. In each iteration of the algorithm, the global best position of particle is selected and the robot moves to next calculated point in order to reach the goal. To be practical, it’s assumed that Robot can detect only obstacles in a limited radius of surrounding with its sensors. Environment is supposed to be dynamic and obstacles can be fixed or movable.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it