MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1760513615 · doi:10.7202/1030228ar

La déploration, de Sarah Bernhardt à Al Pacino. Permanence et migration d’une posture codifiée (arts visuels, théâtre, cinéma1)

2015· article· fr· W1760513615 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueCinémas Revue d études cinématographiques · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSemiotics and Representation Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArtHumanities

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’acteur demeure au coeur de la palette expressive d’artistes (qu’ils soient cinéastes, photographes ou metteurs en scène) recourant à des procédés rhétoriques similaires fondés sur la puissance iconique de certains gestes. Cet article ébauche une enquête figurative sur la reprise stylistique d’un motif partagé par différents champs scéniques et visuels (du théâtre classique au photojournalisme) et des cinématographies diverses (des cinémas muets européen et russe au cinéma hollywoodien contemporain) : la gestuelle codifiée et esthétisée de la déploration (affaissement, cris, mains portées aux tempes ou levées vers le ciel). L’analyse comparative et généalogique de telles survivances de la peinture romantique, de l’expressionnisme, de l’opéra et du mélodrame, qui révèle l’existence de véritables filiations artistiques, va ici de la Sarah Bernhardt de La Tosca (1887) au Pacino du troisième volet du Parrain (1990), en passant par certaines images-choc redondantes qui prolifèrent dans le champ médiatique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.671
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.071
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it