MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1765904459 · doi:10.1109/pesc.1999.789039

Control algorithms for series static voltage regulators in faulted distribution systems

2003· article· en· W1765904459 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHarmonicsUninterruptible power supplyControl theory (sociology)VoltageCompensation (psychology)Fault (geology)Voltage regulationEngineeringElectric power systemPower (physics)Power controlComputer scienceControl engineeringControl (management)Electrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Power quality and availability are becoming important issues for critical and sensitive loads. This paper presents a viable alternative to the use of uninterruptible power supplies solutions for three-phase load voltage support. This support is provided by a series compensator structure with a rating equal to a fraction of the load. The paper discusses control issues and proposes a control algorithm that results in a fast dynamic response and is insensitive to the type of fault and to disturbances and harmonics present on the power network. The technique is applied to a faulted distribution system to compensate for voltage sags. The steady state compensation capability of the scheme is derived. The dynamic performance is analyzed and verified through experimental tests on a 2 kVA prototype power conditioner. Practical issues, such as power and control circuit design and converter ratings are considered.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.927
Threshold uncertainty score0.388

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations28
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207