MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1766024180 · doi:10.4171/jncg/269

Index theory for manifolds with Baas–Sullivan singularities

2018· preprint· en· W1766024180 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Noncommutative Geometry · 2018
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAdvanced Operator Algebra Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGravitational singularityAtiyah–Singer index theoremMathematicsIndex (typography)Pure mathematicsTorsion (gastropod)Context (archaeology)Homology (biology)Mathematical analysisGeographyComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study index theory for manifolds with Baas–Sullivan singularities using geometric K -homology with coefficients in a unital C^* -algebra. In particular, we define a natural analog of the Baum–Connes assembly map for a torsion-free discrete group in the context of these singular spaces. The cases of singularities modelled on k -points (i.e., $\mathbb Z/k\mathbb Z-manifolds) and the circle are discussed in detail. In the case of the former, the associated index theorem is related to the Freed–Melrose index theorem; in the case of the latter, the index theorem is related to work of Rosenberg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Research integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.469
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.389
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it