MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1770557760

A More Efficient Time Petri Net State Space Abstraction Useful to Model Checking Timed Linear Properties

2008· article· en· W1770557760 on OpenAlexaff
Hanifa Boucheneb, Hind Rakkay

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbstractionPetri netPartial order reductionModel checkingComputer scienceAbstraction model checkingState spaceAutomatonTime complexityTheoretical computer scienceConstruct (python library)Extension (predicate logic)Reduction (mathematics)Büchi automatonLinear temporal logicAlgorithmState (computer science)MathematicsProgramming languageDeterministic automaton
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider here time Petri nets (TPN model). We first propose an abstraction to its generally infinite state space which preserves linear properties of the TPN model. Comparing with TPN abstractions proposed in the literature, our abstraction produces graphs which are both smaller and faster to compute. In addition, our characterization of agglomerated states allows a significant gain in space. Afterwards, we show how to apply Yoneda's partial order reduction technique to construct directly reduced graphs useful to verify LTL$_{-X}$ properties of the model. Using our approach, both time and space complexities are reduced. Finally, we propose a time extension for Buchi automata which is useful to model checking timed linear properties of the model, using the abstraction proposed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal)Same topicFormal Methods in VerificationFrench-language works237,207