MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1770557760

A More Efficient Time Petri Net State Space Abstraction Useful to Model Checking Timed Linear Properties

2008· article· en· W1770557760 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePolyPublie (École Polytechnique de Montréal) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicFormal Methods in Verification
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAbstractionPetri netPartial order reductionModel checkingComputer scienceAbstraction model checkingState spaceAutomatonTime complexityTheoretical computer scienceConstruct (python library)Extension (predicate logic)Reduction (mathematics)Büchi automatonLinear temporal logicAlgorithmState (computer science)MathematicsProgramming languageDeterministic automaton
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We consider here time Petri nets (TPN model). We first propose an abstraction to its generally infinite state space which preserves linear properties of the TPN model. Comparing with TPN abstractions proposed in the literature, our abstraction produces graphs which are both smaller and faster to compute. In addition, our characterization of agglomerated states allows a significant gain in space. Afterwards, we show how to apply Yoneda's partial order reduction technique to construct directly reduced graphs useful to verify LTL$_{-X}$ properties of the model. Using our approach, both time and space complexities are reduced. Finally, we propose a time extension for Buchi automata which is useful to model checking timed linear properties of the model, using the abstraction proposed here.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it