MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1772462235 · doi:10.5858/2007-131-1481-fpotcp

Forensic Pathology of Trauma: Common Problems for the Pathologist

2007· article· en· W1772462235 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutopsy Techniques and Outcomes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForensic pathologyPremiseAutopsyMedicineReading (process)BluntGeneral surgeryPsychologyPathologySurgeryLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By Michael J. Shkrum and David A. Ramsay, 648 pp, with illus, Totowa, NJ, Humana Press, 2007.Unlike some forensic science disciplines, the actual practice of forensic pathology rarely has dramatic developments, and coming up with fresh material for a first edition of a textbook can be a difficult challenge to undertake. In this first edition text, coauthored by a pair of Canadian-based forensic pathologists, they have more then stepped up and completed the challenge. The stated premise of the text is that it is meant as a guide to the interpretation of basic injury and wound patterns for the non–forensically trained pathologist who may be asked to perform a forensically oriented autopsy.The 10-chapter book begins with a section on the actual mechanics of the autopsy and autopsy report and contains valuable information that should be required reading for all first-year postgraduate trainees in pathology. Chapter 2, entitled “Postmortem Changes, The Great Pretenders,” which focuses on common postmortem changes that may be misinterpreted as acute trauma, is a natural extension of the preceding chapter. Chapters 3 through 7 tackle the topics of asphyxial deaths, thermal injuries, drowning-related deaths, and penetrating trauma, which is subdivided into separate chapters devoted to gunshot wounds and sharp force injuries. Chapter 8 broadly tackles the topic of blunt force traumatic injuries, with special attention accorded to motor vehicle and transportation-related fatalities. The final 2 chapters of the book are devoted to central nervous system–related injuries and sudden neurologic deaths.Unlike most forensic-oriented texts, the authors have prudently elected to subdivide every chapter into an outline form of organization, which makes for an easy and quick way to get at specific information, as opposed to having to sort through an entire text. The practical approach of this book is reflected in multiple subsections devoted specifically to performing the autopsy within the various patterns of injury, information that will be valuable to anyone without a great deal of previous hands-on experience. Should the reader desire a more in-depth discussion, more than 120 pages of text are devoted to reference citations. Other strengths of the text are the inclusion of applicable histologic correlates to specific injuries.The text is heavily illustrated with black and white photographs throughout, and the photographs selected for inclusion were done with an eye toward the practical approach to the autopsy. Forensic pathology is a very visually oriented discipline, and unfortunately the photographs themselves are the major weak point of the book. The variable quality of the photographs are not infrequently reflected by pictures that appear out of focus, are taken at the improper magnification, are underdeveloped, or fail to adequately illustrate the desired topic. The book does come with an accompanying CD that contains the color counterpoints of the black-and-white photographs; however, there is only a modest improvement with the color photographs.An improperly completed death certificate is the pet peeve of many a forensic pathologist, and I was somewhat disappointed by the lack of discussion on how to appropriately complete a death certificate, a default task that ultimately may be assigned to the pathologist following autopsy completion. Additionally, although 120 pages of references may benefit a small number of users, perhaps a more practical use of some of that space would have been to include examples of sample autopsy reports and gross and microscopic descriptions.Unlike other broad-based forensic texts, such as DiMaio's Forensic Pathology and Spitz and Fisher's Medicolegal Investigation of Death, which have traditionally been the mainstays of the general pathologist's bookshelf and which are frequently referenced by attorneys, criminalists, and mystery writers, the text in Forensic Pathology of Trauma is refreshingly and clearly geared toward the practicing pathologist, particularly the sections devoted toward neuropathology. Overall, the text flows smoothly from one topic to another, and editorializing is kept to a minimum.As a guide to the practical approach to the conduct of the forensic-oriented autopsy for the pathologist without much in the way of formal forensic training, this book can be thoroughly recommended, as it more then adequately succeeds in its stated goal. Additionally, I would highly endorse this text as a valuable reference for both the forensic pathology fellow and the established forensic pathologist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.652
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it