MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1779637050 · doi:10.5555/957289.957326

Pedagogical tools for database design, development and use

2003· article· en· W1779637050 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePrinciples and Practice of Programming in Java · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Database Systems and Queries
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceDatabase schemaDatabase designDatabaseViewRelational databaseDatabase modelDatabase applicationJavaDatabase testingDatabase theorySQLWorld Wide WebProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I teach undergraduate and graduate (MBA) courses in information systems. My primary teaching objective is to help students design and develop dynamic web applications. My students are primarily business oriented; therefore I cannot spend too much time on technical details.A database is a very important part of any dynamic web application. It is also its most technical part. To hide the complexity of database technologies, I developed two tools: Magic Models to design a data model and generate a relational database schema, and Database Framework to allow an easy database access. Both tools are developed in Java. Magic Models is Swing based graphical tool and Database Framework uses JDBC for databases access and updates.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.995
Threshold uncertainty score0.570

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.295
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.084 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it