MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1798477905 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2012-0197

Damage to industrial structures due to the 27 February 2010 Chile earthquake

2013· article· en· W1798477905 on OpenAlexafffundvenueabout
Robert Tremblay, Denis Mitchell, René Tinawi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBracingStructural engineeringCrackingGirderEngineeringBraceBucklingForensic engineeringSeismic analysisInformation siloGeotechnical engineeringSiloMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a summary of the damage to industrial facilities in the Mw 8.8 Chile earthquake of 27 February 2010. The types of damage observed include failure of elevated tanks, collapse and cracking of concrete silos, buckling of steel silos, collapse of conveyor systems, failure of steel bins, and failure of anchor rods. Damage to industrial buildings included buckling of bracing members, failure of brace connections, shear failures of reinforced concrete columns, and shear failures of heavily loaded steel girders. Aspects of the current Chilean design code for industrial structures are reviewed and discussed. Recommendations are proposed for the development of Canadian seismic design provisions for industrial structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.069
Threshold uncertainty score0.137

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2013
Admission routes4
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Civil EngineeringSame topicStructural Response to Dynamic LoadsFrench-language works237,207