MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1798477905 · doi:10.1139/cjce-2012-0197

Damage to industrial structures due to the 27 February 2010 Chile earthquake

2013· article· en· W1798477905 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Civil Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityPolytechnique Montréal
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsBracingStructural engineeringCrackingGirderEngineeringBraceBucklingForensic engineeringSeismic analysisInformation siloGeotechnical engineeringSiloMaterials scienceComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper provides a summary of the damage to industrial facilities in the M w 8.8 Chile earthquake of 27 February 2010. The types of damage observed include failure of elevated tanks, collapse and cracking of concrete silos, buckling of steel silos, collapse of conveyor systems, failure of steel bins, and failure of anchor rods. Damage to industrial buildings included buckling of bracing members, failure of brace connections, shear failures of reinforced concrete columns, and shear failures of heavily loaded steel girders. Aspects of the current Chilean design code for industrial structures are reviewed and discussed. Recommendations are proposed for the development of Canadian seismic design provisions for industrial structures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it