MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1811844708 · doi:10.1109/cca.1997.627531

Discontinuous feedback stabilization of wheeled mobile robots

2002· article· en· W1811844708 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl and Dynamics of Mobile Robots
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNonholonomic systemMobile robotControl theory (sociology)Transformation (genetics)Class (philosophy)Lyapunov functionSet (abstract data type)Sequence (biology)RobotComputer scienceConstant (computer programming)Construct (python library)Motion (physics)Motion controlControl engineeringControl (management)MathematicsArtificial intelligenceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The paper presents a systematic approach to the construction of feedback control for stabilization to set points for a class of nonholonomic wheeled mobile robots. This approach does not necessitate conversion of the system model into a "chained form", and thus does not rely on any special transformation techniques. The feedback controls are piece-wise constant and the method is based on the introduction of a set of guiding functions whose sum vanishes only at the origin. The guiding functions are not Lyapunov functions, however, a comparison of their values allows us to determine a desired direction of system motion and permits us to construct a sequence of controls such that the sum of the guiding functions decreases in an average sense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.167
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicControl and Dynamics of Mobile RobotsFrench-language works237,207