Effects of Physical Hardening on Stress Relaxation in Asphalt Cements
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper documents and discusses an investigation of how physical hardening phenomena during isothermal conditioning affect stress relaxation in asphalt cement. The importance of physical hardening is reviewed with data from trial sections and regular contracts. Seven asphalts were recovered from an Ontario, Canada, pavement trial. Tensile specimens were poured and conditioned for either 20 min or 72 h at low temperatures before being subjected to a stress relaxation test at −10°C. The extended conditioning period could more than double the residual thermal stress at the end of the test. The one asphalt to show no physical hardening came from the section that remained largely free of cracking. A second material that showed a moderate degree of physical hardening only recently started to crack by an appreciable amount. In contrast, the remaining five materials significantly hardened during the extended conditioning period and cracked prematurely and excessively in service. These findings clearly refute the hypotheses that physical hardening is not important and that stress relaxation can reverse the effect or reduce it to insignificance. Materials with an unstable colloidal structure were found most sensitive to physical hardening. The results of this study agree with earlier creep data obtained according to an extended bending beam rheometer test method. Hence, it is imperative that pavements be designed with criteria that take physical hardening effects into account to limit premature and excessive performance failures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it