Chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in an urban community: a controlled comparison of people with and without diabetes
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
Machine scores (provisional)
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
- Teacher spread
- 0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
- Validation status
score_only:v0-immature-baseline· verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it
Abstract
AIMS: A cross-sectional study has been performed in order to estimate the prevalence, severity, and current treatment of chronic painful peripheral neuropathy (CPPN) in people with diabetes in the community. METHODS: Using a structured questionnaire and examination we have assessed these factors in a community sample of people with diabetes (n=350) and compared them with 344 age- and sex-matched people without diabetes from the same locality. RESULTS: The prevalence of CPPN was estimated to be 16.2%[95% confidence interval (CI): 6.8-16%] in people with diabetes compared with 4.9% (95% CI: 2.6-7.2%) in the control sample (P < 0.0001). Diabetic subjects with and without CPPN did not differ in age, sex, type and duration of diabetes, body mass index, smoking status and glycaemic control. However, CPPN diabetic subjects had significantly higher Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain over the preceding 24 h [median (interquartile range) 3.5 (1.5-6.7) cm vs. 0.7 (0-3.9) cm, P < 0.0001]. Also, the total McGill Pain Questionnaire Score (a measure of pain quality and severity) was 18 (13-31.5) vs. 10 (4-16) (P < 0.0001). Of patients with diabetes and CPPN, 12.5% (7/56) had never reported their symptoms to their treating physician and 39.3% (22/56) had never received any treatment for their painful symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: CPPN is common, often severe but frequently unreported and inadequately treated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
The record
- Venue
- Diabetic Medicine
- Topic
- Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Field
- Medicine
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- —
- Keywords
- MedicineDiabetes mellitusInterquartile rangePeripheral neuropathyInternal medicineConfidence intervalVisual analogue scaleBody mass indexDiabetic neuropathyQuality of life (healthcare)Cross-sectional studyType 2 diabetesPhysical therapyEndocrinology
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes