Expanding Accessibility to and Curricular Reform in Latin American Schools: Implications for Social Cohesion
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The article examines Latin American educational policies in the last decade and a half from the perspective of their contribution to social cohesion. After establishing the direct relation between education and social cohesion, the author evaluates the impact of the substantial expansion of schooling in the region as a contributor to social cohesion. The latter takes place because education ensures the sharing of common symbolic resources among a large percentage
 of the population. It also facilitates dynamics of intergenerational mobility that also contribute to social cohesion. The article also presents the results of a comparative analysis of citizen formation
 curricula as developed in seven countries in the region: Argentina, Brazil, Colombia, Chile, Guatemala, Mexico and Peru. The central questions are based on the orientations taken by these countries with regard to the formation of bridging social capital (between groups), or of bonding social capital (within the groups) (Putnam, 2000), and to the relations the curricula establish with the past. The latter has as a point of reference the creation of a common identity
 (national) among groups exhibiting clear socio-economic differences. The analysis concludes that the curriculum orientation of the various countries examined in the study are related to the specific perspective of social cohesion that each national society holds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it