MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1826637051 · doi:10.1002/0471654507.eme395

Six‐Port Networks

2005· other· en· W1826637051 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEncyclopedia of RF and Microwave Engineering · 2005
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave and Dielectric Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSoftware-defined radioRF front endComputer scienceElectronic engineeringElectrical engineeringDigital signal processingMicrostripWirelessEmbedded systemEngineeringComputer hardwareTelecommunicationsRadio frequency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Software‐defined radio (SDR) has been identified as a potential method to enhance flexible wireless communication systems. The operation speed of an analog/digital converter (ADC) and processing ability of digital signal processing (DSP) chips are key factors in the development of SDR for useful commercial applications. More recent advances in semiconductor processing technology and the development of reconfigurable devices such as digital signal processors and field‐programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) reduce the development time of commercial products. SDR in conjunction with six‐port receivers has promising applications for use in wireless LANs, audio and television broadcasting, and interoperability between different radio services, as seen by new studies on the use of six‐port technology in various design aspects of a new SDR receiver. The objective is to realize an application of SDR to provide a multichannel, multimode wireless direct digital receiver. The combination of SDR and six‐port technology provides great flexibility in system configuration; significant reduction in hardware cost, particularly at millimeter‐wave frequencies; and potential for software reuse. The six‐port receiver approach offers wideband accommodation to ever‐changing communication specifications required in a SDR as much of its functionality is defined in software. Different types of six‐port circuits have been designed, with center frequencies at 2.4, 5.8, 24, and 28 GHz, operating over wide frequency bands. Some six‐port circuits are based on microstrip structures and are fabricated with hybrid microwave integrated circuit (MHMIC) or monolithic microwave integrated circuit (MMIC) technology at both microwave and millimeter‐wave frequencies. Other circuits use a novel substrate‐integrated waveguide (SIW) structure allowing integration of planar integrated circuit structure with waveguide structure. The performances of these six‐port circuits in digital receivers are reported in relation to signal modulation schemes, noise performance analysis calibration, and coding. Bit error rate simulation and measurement results obtained with demodulation algorithms are given for QPSK and QAM‐16 signals under a variety of operating conditions. Initial results show promising applications of six‐port technology for direct digital conversion demodulation reception, needed in future low‐cost SDR communication systems. Measurement and simulated demodulation results obtained with coding algorithms are also given.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.290
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it