La dette nationale dans les quotidiens québécois des années 1990 : un discours adapté à son époque
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L'idee selon laquelle le gouvernement canadien aurait, apres des annees d'irresponsabilite au chapitre des depenses sociales, a reprendre de toute urgence le controle de sa dette publique a occupe tout au long des annees 1990 une place de choix dans les principaux journaux francophones du Quebec. Offrant un argumentaire relativement homogene, les articles sur le sujet suggeraient que le Canada n'avait d'autres options que de couper radicalement dans ses depenses sociales afin de retrouver son equilibre budgetaire. Or, en parallele a ce type de « discours sur la dette » se voyait a la meme epoque defendue par certains experts une tout autre analyse - tres peu reprise par les memes quotidiens - de la situation fiscale canadienne. Comment expliquer que le discours des coupures necessaires dans les programmes sociaux se soit ainsi impose comme seule « verite » legitime du probleme de l'endettement national? C'est en mettant celle-ci en perspective avec les ecrits sur la propagande moderne de Jacques Ellul que nous tentons de donner une premiere reponse a cette question.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.020 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".