MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1832358652 · doi:10.4000/lhomme.23217

La sculpture maorie et l’histoire coloniale

2012· article· fr· W1832358652 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueL Homme · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLiterature and Cultural Memory
Canadian institutionsTrinity College
FundersEconomic and Social Research Council
KeywordsArtHumanitiesSculptureEthnologyArt historyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

RésuméCet article traite de la circulation de l’art indigène à la fin du XIXe et au début du XXe siècles, et les effets de ces voyages dans les mondes indigènes et européens d’aujourd’hui. Tene Waitere (vers 1854-1931) est très généralement considéré comme le plus important sculpteur maori de la période coloniale. En plus de sculptures importantes faites pour ses proches parents et pour d’autres Maoris, il a produit des œuvres pour les touristes, les ethnologues et les musées coloniaux, notamment la grande maison sculptée « Rauru », qui se trouve au Museum für Völkerkunde de Hambourg. S’appuyant sur les écrits de Marc Augé, Pierre Nora et W. G. Sebald, et aussi sur le travail du photographe néo-zélandais Mark Adams, cet essai se penche sur les significations passées et présentes des œuvres de Waitere dans leurs cadres européens.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.742
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it