Risk analysis of dam based on artificial bee colony algorithm with fuzzy <i>c</i>-means clustering
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
During recent years, risk analysis has been introduced into infrastructure engineering, and has greatly improved the design, construction, and operation. In this paper, we study the risk of dams in the perspective of clustering analysis. Fuzzy c-means clustering (FCM) is widely used in many fields since it is simple and fast. However the result of FCM technique is sensitive to the initialization of clustering centres and is easily trapped into local optima. To improve the performance of FCM, an artificial bee colony algorithm (ABC) with FCM is proposed. By introducing ABC, the shortcomings of the original FCM method is overcome. The proposed clustering algorithm is demonstrated on a benchmark classification problem and two dam risk analysis problems. Results show that it is more accurate and robust than FCM, and it is an efficient tool for risk analysis of dams.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it