MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1841466785 · doi:10.1080/14649360410001690295

British social and cultural geography: beyond turns and dualisms?

2004· article· en· W1841466785 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueSocial & Cultural Geography · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Geography and Geographical Thought
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAotearoaCultural geographySocial geographySociologyHuman geographyAction (physics)Cultural studiesCultural landscapeMedia studiesGender studiesSocial scienceAnthropologyGeographyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Click to increase image sizeClick to decrease image size Notes ‘Envisioning Geographies: Social and Cultural Perspectives’, organized by the Social and Cultural Geography Study Group of the RGS/IBG, London, June 2003 Our view is that, within the English‐speaking world, social and cultural geographers in Australia, Aotearoa/New Zealand and Canada have been more successful at wedding theory and action in their work While more of this work falls in what is traditionally ‘social’ geography, a session on ‘Cultural Geography at the Coalface’ organized by Sara McKian at the RGS/IBG conference in London, September 2003, showcased many examples of policy‐engaged work in cultural geography There are other potential meeting points—we have focused here on one which seems particularly significant at the time of writing.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.408
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.004
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.276 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it