MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1841647363

k-Nearest Neighbors Queries in Time-Dependent Road Networks

2012· article· en· W1841647363 on OpenAlexaff
Lívia Almada Cruz, Mário A. Nascimento, José Antônio Fernandes de Macêdo

Bibliographic record

VenueCadernos de Linguística e Teoria da Literatura (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicData Management and Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceCorrectnessPruningk-nearest neighbors algorithmSpeedupEffiData miningConstant (computer programming)AlgorithmArtificial intelligenceDatabase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. In this article, we study the problem of processing k-nearest neighbors (kNN) queries in road networks considering traffic conditions, in particular the case where the speed of moving objects is time-dependent. For instance, given that the user is at a given location at certain time, the query returns the k points of interest (e.g., gas stations) that can be reached in the minimum amount of time. Previous works have proposed solutions to answer kNN queries in road networks where the moving speed in each road is constant. Obviously, these solutions cannot be simply applied to the problem we are interested in. Our approach uses the well-known A ∗ search algorithm by applying incremental network expansion and pruning unpromising vertices. We discuss the design and correctness of our algorithm and present experimental results that show the efficiency and effectiveness of our solution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCadernos de Linguística e Teoria da Literatura (Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais)Same topicData Management and AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207