The Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatrics—The SickKids Experience 2004–2008
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The ventricular assist device (VAD) Berlin Heart EXCOR Pediatrics was utilized at our institution since 2004 for bridging pediatric patients to cardiac transplantation or myocardial recovery. The present study reviewed our results following VAD implantation. We retrospectively reviewed patients that underwent implantation of a VAD between October 2004 and October 2008. Data collected included age at implantation, gender, weight, underlying disease, pre- and postdevice clinical status, complications, and outcome. Fifteen patients were identified (9 female and 6 male, average age: 8.8 years, range 0.3-14.8; average weight 31.1 kg, range 5.2-86.4). Indications for VAD support were dilated cardiomyopathy in 14 patients and progressing heart failure with a single ventricle physiology (bidirectional Glenn shunt) in one patient. Three patients (20%) were bridged from extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to VAD. Average support was 29 (1-108) days. Fourteen patients were on a bi-VAD, one patient (single ventricle) had single VAD support. Three patients developed mediastinal/pericardial fluid collections, requiring surgical exploration in two, and drain insertion in one. Three patients presented with neurological symptoms. In two patients, a total of three blood pumps were exchanged due to thrombus formation. No patient was weaned off the VAD; two patients (13%) died on the VAD. All surviving patients are neurologically intact at follow-up. In our experience, VAD support provides an effective means of bridging children with advanced dilated cardiomyopathy or heart failure to transplantation with a relatively small number of complications and deaths given the complexity of the patient population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".