MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Memoir of Lieutenant Dumont, 1715-1747: A Sojourner in the French Atlantic

2017· dataset· en· W1845798 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueThe SHAFR Guide Online · 2017
Typedataset
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicColonialism, slavery, and trade
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMemoirDiplomacyHistoryOfficerArt historyClassicsArtPoliticsLawPolitical scienceArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Memoir of Lieutenant Dumont, 1715--1747: A Sojourner in the French Atlantic. By Jean-Francois-Benjamin Dumont de Montigny. Translated by Gordon M. Sayre. Edited by Gordon M. Sayre and Carla Zecher. (Chapel Hill: Published by University of North Carolina Press for the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture, 2012. Pp. [xiv], 455. $50.00, ISBN 978-0-8078-3722-1.) Jean-Francois-Benjamin Dumont de Montigny (1696-1760) was, to put it mildly, a real piece of work. Indeed, this French naval officer-turned-picaro cuts quite a figure in his lengthy memoir, held in manuscript form since the early twentieth century at the Newberry Library in Chicago and now published in English translation for the first time by the Omohundro Institute of Early American History and Culture. Bouncing back and forth across the Atlantic, Dumont's narrative affords a unique view of everything from gender relations, to French-Native American diplomacy, to the gossipy inner workings of Louis XV's military, all filtered through the mind of an author keen to present himself as an honest man (if an unusually witty one) in a world of liars and dullards. Completed in 1747, Dumont's manuscript memoir recounted his experiences in a period that, to an observer in Europe, might have seemed exceptionally peaceful. Between the War of the Spanish Succession (1701-1714) and the War of the Austrian Succession (1740-1748), ministers Andre-Hercule de Fleury and Robert Walpole strove to maintain a fragile entente cordiale between France and Great Britain, managing to limit the outbreak of hot wars between the two old rivals. Dumont's life, however, was defined by violent conflict at the edges of empire. After voyages to Quebec and Mobile Bay in the 1710s, he arrived in the Mississippi River Valley in 1721 just as Louisiana began to emerge from the financial collapse of John Law's Company of the Indies. Spending the better part of the next two decades in French Louisiana, Dumont participated in the 1723 French war with the Natchez and the first Chickasaw war in 1736. He also described the 1722 French war with the Natchez, the bloody Natchez revolt of 1729, and the second Chickasaw war in 1739 in his memoir. Enmeshed in a world of native enemies, native allies, designing monarchs, and the slow-burning presence of Louisiana's growing population of African slaves, Dumont's tale reflects the possibilities and perils of life in a contested, multicultural borderland. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Dataset · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.657
Threshold uncertainty score0.683

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0240.010
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.345 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreDataset

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe SHAFR Guide OnlineSame topicColonialism, slavery, and tradeFrench-language works237,207